Tag archive

city commission

Editorial: Anti-racism in Safety Harbor

in city hall/news/photos
Yard sign outside of Safety Harbor's City Hall reads "Black Lives Matter and justice for all." (Photo/Kathryn Malaxos)
Yard sign outside of Safety Harbor's City Hall reads "Black Lives Matter and justice for all." (Photo/Kathryn Malaxos)

Safety Harbor is a small southern town. What are the implications of that phrase — “small southern town”? What are the implications of racism in small southern towns? In cities and towns across this country? Have we, as citizens of a small southern town, chosen to ignore the impact of history? In doing so, what are we missing about our town’s present?

White people in this town — in every town — have the luxury of ignoring racism. And we do it every day. Many of us who purport to hold justice and freedom dear have the luxury to ignore what is right in front of us. But for Black residents, there is no luxury of ignorance.

Keep Reading

City Facilities Slowly Reopen Street Closures, Aid Debated

in city hall/news/photos

The City of Safety Harbor plans to slowly open city-run facilities that have been closed to the public due to the COVID-19 pandemic with the goal of having city hall and the Safety Harbor Public Library open by June 1. 

The city pier and waterfront boardwalks were opened over the weekend, and the fitness center in the Safety Harbor Community Center could open next week, said City Manager Matt Spoor during the Monday night city commission meeting. 

He said these facilities will be opened under Center for Disease Control guidelines that include social distancing and limited capacity.  Face shields to protect employees are being installed. Spoor said that the city needs to careful about letting the public know about openings to avoid a rush or crowd that couldn’t be handled. 

There was a lot of discussion, but no action taken on offering financial aid to people and/or businesses hurt by COVID-19 closure.  

Also, no action was taken on Mayor Joe Ayoub’s proposal to close off a portion of Main Street to vehicle traffic to make room for expanded outdoor dining at restaurants for at least the next two weekends.  

Ayoub said Spoor had been in contact with several restaurants in town and the majority were in favor of the closures, even restaurants that would not be in area that might be closed off. 

Commissioner Carlos Diaz said that while he is skeptical about the benefits from doing this, he favored giving it a try.   

Commissioner Cliff Merz said he is concerned about what might happen if weekend closures created a “3rd Friday” festival atmosphere and drew crowds. “COVID is still with us and will be with us,” he said. “And the reason that it’s at the level is it now is because of the protections that were in place, so things are slowly opening, and we’ll see how that works.”  

He said it might work if the restaurants required reservations and customers came in an orderly fashion but if it became a “big collection of people” and it was up to law enforcement to break it up then that would not be the right approach.   Commissioners Andy Zudrow and Nancy Besore also expressed concerns about potential crowding. 

After a lengthy discussion among commissioners on what kind of financial aid to give to those impacted by COVID-19 with nothing settled on, Mayor Ayoub asked the city manager to gather more information on costs and administration of giving utility discounts of $1,000 to businesses that qualify and at least $100 to individuals that qualify.   

This information may be presented at the June 1 commission meeting. 

In other action, commissioners approved $62,500 for the installation of a 20-foot gazebo/gathering place for the Folly Farm city park. There were some objections from the public over spending these funds while some citizens are in financial need due to the pandemic. 

The mayor and city commissioners pointed out that this money is from capital improvement funds that can’t be spent on social-help programs.  The gazebo was a gift to the city from George Weiss who also donated the Folly Farm park land. He donated $25,000 for the gazebo in 2019 and its been in storage.  

The $62,500 was the lowest of three bids for land preparation, grading, concrete slab, gazebo assembly, electrical work, paved patio and other site work. 

City Aid on Hold for Safety Harbor Businesses

in city hall/news/photos
BarFly, minus outdoor seating, on April 1, 2020. (Photo/Kathryn Malaxos)

The Safety Harbor Mayor and City Commissioners say they want to offer financial help to local businesses hurt by the recent temporary closure enforced to slow the COVID-19 pandemic.

At the Monday night virtual meeting, commissioners indicated the city is willing to invest more than $200,000 to provide aid.

But they don’t have a program yet, and it won’t be coming until after the May 18 meeting. Although commissioners mentioned restaurants, the types of businesses where the vouchers could be used was not determined. Also not determined was whether the utility credits would be for businesses or for businesses and households.

Keep Reading

Amid COVID-19 Concerns The First Virtual City Commission Meeting

in city hall/news
Safety Harbor's City Commission, April 20, 2020.
Safety Harbor's City Commission, April 20, 2020. (Screenshot/Walt Belcher)

The first virtual meeting of the Safety Harbor City Commission Monday night used modern technology, but with no video it came off more like a radio broadcast. 

Unable to meet at City Hall because of the restrictions imposed to slow the spread of the COVID-19 virus, the Commissioners stayed home and met for an hour and eight minutes via the Internet using the Zoom application. 

Citizens who signed in to watch it on phones, tablets or computer laptops first saw a group photo of the four Commission members and Mayor Joe Ayoub. There also were various power point slides shown during the meeting. 

City Manager Matt Spoor said the reason there was no video was because there was no TV station to broadcast the Zoom meeting.

Without video, listeners had to identify speakers by their voices. And the Commissioners and Mayor could not see each other. But they managed to successfully conduct the meeting. 

Routine city business like approving a contract for $68,890 for curb and sidewalk repairs in Lincoln Heights or amending the city’s contract with the Pinellas Sheriff’s Office by $4,776 to add a 14th school crossing guard (to work the intersection of Marshall Street and 1st Ave N) were over-shadowed by concerns about the impact the virus is having on the city. 

Mayor Joe Ayoub said he wanted to thank the people of Safety Harbor for “doing such a good job in following the guidelines for safety handed down by the state and county.” 

“I see that a lot of people are taking this seriously and are wearing masks and being responsible” he said. In these difficult times, he said he is getting e-mails and messages from people saying that the city needs to have tougher regulations and e-mails saying just the opposite. “I can assure everybody that we are working to find the right balance to protect everybody’s health and well-being,” he said. 

He urged the public to “please, please, please help local businesses that are still open. A lot of them are struggling.”  

Commissioner Andy Zudrow also said he wanted to “reach out the public and just make sure that everybody remains safe and healthy during this pandemic that we’re dealing with. We’re all in this together.”  

Commissioner Nancy Besore gave a shout out salute to the city’s firefighters and chief Josh Stefancic for organizing a recent event at the Mease Hospital where, while standing six feet apart, they applauded health workers during a shift change at the hospital. “Just to see the appreciation in the eyes of the health workers over their masks was incredible,” she said. 

“Everybody is really sacrificing right now to try and stop this terrible virus so we can move ahead with our lives,” said Commissioner Carlos Diaz. He said he wanted to help Safety Harbor businesses that are struggling and asked City Manager Matt Spoor and fellow Commissioners to explore ways to help them financially.  

Commissioner Cliff Merz added that going through this difficult time “with an unchartered and uncertain future, it’s hard going downtown and through our beautiful city and finding not much happening. How we can help each other is important now.” 

At the outset of the meeting, Ayoub was sworn in from home for a new term, having won re-election in March. Also sworn-in from his home was Commissioner Carlos Diaz.  Commissioner Cliff Merz was appointed vice mayor for another term. 

Although the city had opened numerous ways for public comments, such as by e-mail, phone, or the “hand” raising function on Zoom, there were no public statements. 

City Manager Matt Spoor said there were a total of 70 people participating including the Commissioners and staff.  The next meeting is set for May 4. 

City Commission goes virtual

in city hall/news
Signs posted on Safety Harbor's City Hall doors signal the closing of the building due to the coronavirus crisis. March 25, 2020. (Photo/Kathryn Malaxos)

It could be the first step toward a new way of doing Safety Harbor City Commission meetings or it could be a bit of mess.The first ever Zoom City Commission Meeting will be Monday night at 7 pm live in your living room should you decide to watch.Due to COVID-19 safer-at-home restrictions, the City of Safety Harbor plans to hold the monthly City Commission meeting using virtual and audio communications technology.

What’s on the agenda?  The swearing in of Joe Ayoub as Mayor and Carlos Diaz as City Commissioner along with approval of a contract with the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Department for policing services. The full agenda is at the city’s website.

The “Public Comments” part of the meeting, which apparently can get lively, will be sprinkled through the meeting (depending on the subject). To get your two-cents worth in, it may be a bit complicated, especially for those who are technology-challenged. Members of the public who wish to comment during the meeting have several options.You can e-mail in advance to PComment@cityofsafetyharbor.com. Emailed comments under 500 words will be read aloud during the meeting, longer emails will be provided to the City Commissioners but will not be read aloud. 

You can use traditional mail. (Better hurry!) Mail To: City Clerk, Attn.: Public Comment | 750 Main Street | Safety Harbor, FL 34695. Mailed comments under 500 words will be read aloud during the meeting; longer emails will be provided to the City Commissioners but will not be read aloud.

You can try to get a question in with Voice Live during the meeting: Hit the “Raise Your Hand” button and the host will be notified and you may be called on at the appropriate time. Live public comment may only be shared during the associated agenda item or as part of audience to be heard. At all other times, live participants should be on “mute” to minimize background noise and feedback. If this doesn’t happen, who knows what you will hear. You can read more about this on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/events/846999225796140/

Also the city is holding a virtual Town Hall Meeting on Saturday at 3 p.m. to explain all this. If you have never used Zoom, it’s s available from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store. or on a web browser. Enter Zoom Meeting ID # 202 417 489. Web Browser: https://zoom.us/j/202417489 to watch or listen live.

Safety Harbor Candidates’ Q&A

in city hall/news
city seal
(Photo/Kathryn Malaxos)

Election Day is next Tuesday, March 17. The last day for posting of mail-in ballots was Tuesday, March 10th. Early voting started March 7 and goes through March 15. There are five precincts in Safety Harbor. In addition to the national primaries, several Pinellas county municipal elections are also on the ballot. Safety Harbor has two open seats; mayor and commission seat four. Two candidates are running for mayor: incumbent Joe Ayoub and Tanja Vidovic. Three are vying for the Commission seat: incumbent Carlos Diaz, John Estok, and David Roth.

All are three-year terms with no term limits. The new officials will be involved in directing a few critical issues, primarily growth management and the Ready for 100 initiative.

League of Women Voters Candidates Forum

On January 30, the League of Women Voters hosted a Candidates Forum at the Safety Harbor Spa. The League followed up with publication of Election Guides for both the Mayoral and Commission Seat #4 contests.

Ten (more) questions from the Safety Harbor Sun

In an effort to gain a deeper understanding of candidates’ unique or specific ideas for addressing residents’ concerns, the Safety Harbor Sun met with each candidate and asked a series of ten questions. Although the mayoral race has received some additional press coverage since the Forum, the Safety Harbor Sun‘s focus is on the issues of concern to residents and both of the contests. Responses are lightly edited or condensed for brevity.

The Master Plan has a statement to encourage expansion of public transit linkages. Do you believe that car-free transit options should be a component of future downtown planning and do you have any thoughts on bus service expansion or other alternatives?

Estok: I don’t believe there will be justification for additional routes within Safety Harbor unless density increases. Regional bus routes for Northern Pinellas County would be more effective … Property owners in Safety Harbor contribute almost one million dollars annually to PSTA [Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority] (via a 0.75 property tax) but we don’t reap anywhere near that in service … Regarding trains, I’m skeptical of CSX connections; Sun Rail in Orlando has been a flop. For car-free options, we can add bike lanes; the city could take over Philippe Parkway, Enterprise Road, and the west end of Main Street.

Diaz: Car-free options should definitely be a component of future development. I believe we’re in the middle of this issue of congestion. Cars have been an incredible invention and have pushed society forward, but that’s been at a cost; they’re invasive and take up valuable resources. Price, insurance, road maintenance, and liabilities are concerns for many communities. Where will technology take us next?

Bus expansion or other options; I’d be for it, but that’s up to the county. I would advocate for Safety Harbor residents if they want it. The [Jolley] Trolley that was here didn’t have enough use. The mass transit challenge is the last mile; that’s where technology would come in.

Roth: Yes, absolutely we should coordinate with the county. We say we want a walkable downtown but how do people get there? I have no ideas on bus service, because I don’t know much about it, but I think working on the issue county-wide is important.

Vidovic: Absolutely, the city should advocate for this. There are members of the community who don’t use cars for various reasons and we should try to connect them to existing routes. PSTA advocacy to get people to Tampa, Clearwater, etc. Let residents know what is currently available to increase ridership. Other options are limited due to infrastructure, so helping with walkability and bike routes would help.

Ayoub: Yes, alternative options are good; bus options are up to county. PSTA has cut back on busing due to budget constraints. Advocating is important and  having relationships is good. I have served on that board in the past. On the possibility of additional routes-yes, I’d be for that.

Parking downtown has been raised as a concern for some residents, particularly during events & festivals, but increasingly on non-event days. Do you have any specific ideas to address this concern regarding improving parking spaces on a daily basis and during events?

Estok: Follow the code; don’t waive the code where parking is required.  When exceptions are given, it creates problems. I will not vote for code waivers … A parking garage could be built on city lots on Eighth Avenue, but I don’t want to do that.

For event parking; buses should be used to shuttle people from subdivision — like a Park-and-Ride. 

From here on, limit development density and adhere to parking requirements for new buildings.

Library second story: This is really for meeting rooms. Is this necessary?  The City Commission chambers frequently sit empty. Using this is cheaper than a $2.5 million addition. Part of the cost will have to include parking.  No other specific ideas on parking spaces. I won’t support meters. It’s not a priority with the current commission. The city hasn’t commissioned a parking study, but had discussed parklets which would take up parking spots and be (used) for leisure use.

Diaz: Yes, it’s becoming a problem. The city needs better messaging about where parking is available, including in surrounding neighborhoods. Better organization; on Thursday through Saturday nights the city could offer valet parking  in coordination with community churches or other businesses. If we get the local businesses involved to help pay for this it would benefit all businesses. Re[garding] increasing spaces; I don’t want to sacrifice our ambience for extra parking. I’m skeptical about whether we can find space on the streets. There’s been no discussion about a parking garage.

For events; we could use shuttle services for remote parking. For private events, the vendors must submit a parking plan.

Roth: I don’t have any specific solutions, but I have an issues survey on my website and parking is the number one issue that comes up. But when you suggest parking options, no one wants it “there.” There’s a strong NIMBY factor in Safety Harbor on this and other concerns that come up. It’s something that needs to be discussed and options floated. Some local churches have started to offer park and ride options. At some point the city has to come up with solutions. A democracy doesn’t always appease everyone but hopefully will be in the best long-term interest of the city. For events; partner with churches to provide shuttles.

Vidovic: Yes, that is a big concern. The new building was supposed to include 87 parking spots and they only added 31. On a daily basis, increased density created this problem downtown. It’s hard to fix. We should ask employees to park further away. It will get worse if we don’t address density. Potentially more bus pickup; encourage biking and walking more.  Safety Harbor is 95% developed; no one wants a five-story parking garage.

For events, vendors and their trucks should park remotely at Folly Farms or one of the schools — and Leisure Services should be shuttling them downtown. The city already has busses and staff are often working at events.

Ayoub: I’m always looking to acquire property for parking; we’re mostly built out, but I keep in touch with property owners. Events are the biggest problem, last year the city started requiring organizers to provide parking options for their events. They must have a plan to handle parking, such as using shuttle buses and they’re required to find locations for parking. 

Would you advocate for drawing a grocery store to downtown Safety Harbor? If yes, how should the city proceed?

Estok: Probably not feasible since there’s not enough people downtown to support this.

Diaz: Yes, that would be awesome; something small like a Sprouts. That type of sophisticated business is not going to come without a proper infrastructure in place; that is, a building that meets their requirements.  The city could talk to property owners on Main Street about developing their property for that outcome.

Roth: I haven’t heard this from anyone. No big chain, but a small organic grocer would be nice. I have no preconceived notions on it. That is rolled into the parking issue. I’m not afraid to discuss it.

Vidovic: It would have to be the right store; a small local store would be great. Off of Ninth Street could accommodate a larger store with parking. A small store would be well-supported. It’s one of the things downtown is missing.

City role: [The] business development liaison could reach out and put the word out that the city is interested.

Ayoub: Yes, I have been advocating for this. I asked the the economic development liaison to look for a green grocer to locate to Main Street. The ideal location would be the old post office; we had several people look at it, but no deal has been made. That contributes to a more walkable downtown. One of goals of the Master Plan was to do this, so I’m trying to keep it on commissioners’ minds.

Firefighter staffing was discussed at the Candidate Forum. What is the issue here and do you think it’s a problem?

Estok: It’s not discussed at the meetings hardly. What I hear and feel is that the rank-and-file firefighters think that the chief is just doing what the city manager wants and that their needs are irrelevant. There’s also the feeling that city positions are being filled by Largo associates who will do what the city manager wants.

Diaz: It’s being overplayed a bit. The Fire Chief works with the police, other fire departments, ambulances and 911. The Largo Central Command has a sophisticated system to route 911 calls. There are a lot of analytics involved; resources have to be deployed carefully. The county coordinates all of the different pieces. It’s better to be part of the larger county system with more resources than being a stand-alone system.

Roth: I’ve looked at the plan with the county and I don’t have a problem with it. The concerns are based on a misunderstanding of how things are done here versus other areas of Tampa Bay. I don’t have a problem with the staffing; I’ve done a lot of research on this, but not every issue has a definitive answer.

Vidovic: The issue is NFPA [National Fire Protection Association] & AHA [American Heart Association] make the recommendation for a minimum staffing of four, preferably five, based on how many people it takes to effectively put out fires. Our staffing is three; twice last month the staffing was two and one truck was out of service for a shift due to lack of staff.  There are ways to cut funding; public safety shouldn’t be one of them. A recently-retired fire fighter brought up safety concerns to the commission and the city manager and he was written up for it and given a suspension. Our staff should be listened to, not reprimanded for speaking out.

NFPA makes recommendations based on studies and fires. Often calls are downgraded and the BLS [Basic Life Support] calls can’t get there in time if the situation turns into a heart problem.

Ayoub: It’s not an issue or a problem. Response time, efficiency, and level of service are getting better. We have saved money, but the level of service has improved. We’re staffed appropriately. Eighty to ninety percent of the time we’re above the county minimum. One hundred percent of the time we meet the minimum. Changes were made to priority dispatch. We’re keeping our resources available for life-threatening issues.

Ready for 100: Are you familiar with it? Do you think it’s feasible to achieve 100% renewable energy by 2050? Will you establish a committee that includes residents to formulate a plan to implement changes?

Estok: Now comes the hard part: Who will bear the cost of implementation? We don’t need a Sustainability Coordinator now because there’s no plan to coordinate. Policy should come from citizens and the commission and then decide if we need a coordinator. We shouldn’t be dictated to. This is a budgeting issue. Where is pollution coming from? Where are we now and where are we going? We’re going to have to rely on consultants to give us advice on this.

Grants are a better incentive than tax cuts for this. I’m not in favor of cluttering up the tax code with preferences for specific uses. It is feasible for the city to pursue going solar. The city wants to build a new city hall; I’m in favor of charter amendments for this type of enormous expense. The community should be involved.

Diaz: 100% yes. A lot of it is technology-based. The community should be involved. It’s a pretty big plan. Once we see what the city manager comes up with regarding objectives over the next three years and how to implement it, it’s a big plan and the city may need some help.   

Where we can go solar in the city, we should. Right now, the current City Hall can’t go solar because we’d have to cut down trees, but in some locations we should.

Roth: Yes. Cities have already done it. Pick small things and do them; then the process accelerates. Yes, include residents. First, get a Sustainability Coordinator who will act as liaison to the community. Multiple municipalities are doing this, so we leverage that and pool resources and information, including the free information available. Sierra Club is targeting Pinellas County, so possibly eighty percent of the county will be involved. They’re interested in economic justice. Anything that reduces costs should benefit residents due to lower costs. Use the offset money to spend on other projects. We’ll educate citizens about installing solar, as Dunedin is doing, as well as offer grants. That includes pushing back against the energy companies who have convinced the state to stop offering subsidies.

Vidovic: Yes, I stand with the Sierra Club and it’s possible to do this way before 2050. First steps now should be simple things to reduce consumption, like switching to LED bulbs and installing solar wherever we can. What we can’t make on our own, we can buy blocks from Duke. 

Provide grants for homeowners to install solar. Mayor stated that he wouldn’t sign the initiative unless the city took out environmental justice language to include all members of the community. We need a Sustainability Board and administrator. Reach out to all neighborhoods quarterly to let them know what’s available and hear what they need. Form alliances to buy solar in bulk.

Ayoub: Absolutely. The goal is 2035 for city operations and city-wide by 2050. We’re looking at hiring a Sustainability Coordinator and we need to work with other local governments on knowledge and resource sharing.  Working on a plan to move forward; that may or may not include a committee. We’re not at the stage yet to involve residents, but people are very engaged in this issue. The meetings on Ready for 100 were packed; everyone was engaged and emotional; there is already a high level of interest. Tampa Bay magazine did a profile on community leaders in the area … and I would guess 70% of the leaders were talking about sustainability and climate change. There’s a lot of awareness.

Development variances are a hot button issue for some Safety Harbor residents, particularly regarding home height & setbacks. Is this actually a problem — or an issue of perception? What about with commercial housing or business development variances or waivers?

Diaz: Home variances — very few variances are given. Most things are done according to code. If we do give a variance, there’s usually a give-and-take. It’s hard to have a code that addresses all types of variables.

Commercial housing and business development: Second and Main is the first building in years; concessions were made on each side. [The} developer installed tree culverts and they built a 42-foot building when 45-foot was allowed at the time. He was willing to forgo funds and save money in the long run. The city worked with him.

Roth: Over the last few years I’ve seen too many votes that favor exceptions and not enough push back. However, some people have totally the wrong perception of what’s going on. When I show people the downtown development map, people are appalled to see eight blocks of Main Street and two blocks on either side are zoned to have 35-foot high buildings on both sides. The zoning is in place and we need to review it. I would like to see that changed to read two-story buildings.

Commercial variances should not be any different than residential; it should all be two-story zoning. We need to poll residents on various issues.

Vidovic: It is a huge issue; our infrastructure cannot support more density.  Pinellas County is 95% built out. Building up increases traffic, flooding; there’s less parking, the storm system can’t handle more water. The fact that we are still building in flood zones is crazy. Tree canopy reduction increases heat index. When we reduce setbacks and cut down trees there’s less permeable land. A twenty-five percent tree canopy lowers temperatures ten degrees in cities. Infrastructure can’t be replaced without raising taxes. I don’t think the community wants more density.

Commercial: A variance should be a rare thing. Everyone should follow existing codes; if rules need changing, let’s change it. 

Ayoub: I think it’s both; [a] perception and a real issue. We’ve made dozens of changes to the code over the last few years. One issue is that we need homes that are compatible with existing homes; smaller footprints. We may give a residential height variance in exchange for a smaller footprint. It’s a give and take. Iron Age Street did not get a variance.

Commercial: I don’t recall issuing variances for a bigger footprint. You’ve got to look at the full picture from the first proposal to the second proposal.  There’s only been one building in the last fifteen years and this one was built so it’s smaller, less tall and more compatible with the existing neighborhoods.

Do you think the city’s communication methods regarding events and around future planning need improving? If yes, how can this be done with current staffing models?

Diaz: Lack of transparency was brought up in the Forum. Everything is public record and there are at least two meetings for every project. I don’t know how we can get more information out there. Perhaps we should use social media more and perhaps we should reorganize the website.

We could do a citizen poll or work with committees about how to get their message out.

Roth: Yes, there should be more cohesion and communication is too fragmented. The website and social media communication needs changing. For staffing, I don’t know how the staffing works. The website is outsourced.

It’s not acceptable to have to go to multiple places for information. Interesting that meetings are cancelled but the website is not updated, or it’s at the bottom of the page. You shouldn’t have to hunt for updates.

Vidovic: Absolutely we need to have a better transparent government … we need to do a better job letting people know about planning … People often don’t know about buildings until they’re underway. There are forgotten neighborhoods that don’t know what grants are available to them.

Ayoub: There’s room for improvement, but in general I think we do a good job with communication. I was out knocking on doors during The Best Damn Race and people were appreciative of the notifications. We don’t need additional staffing; it’s just looking for better ways to communicate.

Our walkable downtown is a desirable bonus, but affordable housing is limited in Safety Harbor. How can the city government ensure that affordability is preserved and encouraged?

Diaz: We are limited in what the municipality can do. A few years ago we were going to donate some land to a developer for affordable housing. The cost they came back with was about $230,000, which is too high. I was expecting it to be about $150,000. Additionally the residents were not happy about it. There may be a perception problem with the term affordable housing. Also, where would we put it? On Cedar Street I want to remind people that apartments were prop0sed and everyone was against it.

Roth: It’s sad when employees can’t afford to live in the city where they work.

People agree it’s a problem but no real steps have been made to make that happen.

Vidovic: That is hard to do. The original agreement for the apartments (on Second Avenue) were supposed to be affordable but are $2300-a-month for a small two-bedroom. Everyone wants their house value to be high, but that increases the taxes.

The city needs to look at other small towns to see who is doing it right and follow their model. Do some research and see what works.

Ayoub: It’s tough; we’ve looked at a lot the city owns on Elm Street. The city can offer incentives … for very nice housing, but the perception of the neighbors was that they hated the idea. At the meetings with the surrounding neighborhoods, we gave a really good presentation, but they weren’t really listening .… everyone just kept talking about Section Eight housing. Everyone’s high-level in-theory in favor of it, but if it’s going to be near them, they don’t want it.

The city dropped the idea of that location, but it’s still in our vision to pursue affordable housing.

Regarding general budget allocations, do you have any final thoughts on how the city budget is currently managed and how decisions are made that impact city residents? 

Diaz: The city is being run very efficiently and we’ve been responsible with the budget.  It’s important to have a balanced budget over the span of several years. Keep millage rate stable. 

Roth: No thoughts on this; I haven’t looked into it. That’s why I’ve been going to committee meetings to learn more about it.

Vidovic: It’s not horrible but there’s always room for improvement. For example in city parks, why are we pulling out established and native plants and putting in annuals and grass turf that requires constant upkeep and water? Why are we buying plastic products and preaching sustainability? 

Salaries; higher ups making big salaries but there are twenty-three positions that make less than $11 per hour. We need to shore up city reserves for projects such as Bishop Creek that will cost the city a lot of money.

Ayoub: I’m a CPA and it’s important to me to keep the budget balanced. We haven’t raised the millage rate in four years. The budget is the biggest policy initiative the commission passes every year. To get people interested in the budget is an enormous challenge.

We’ll have meetings where we were passing the budget and we don’t have anybody in attendance. We encourage people to attend. Maybe they trust us to do the right thing.

Our reserves are very healthy. We have emergency and stabilization funds and additional money on top of it. We’re over where we need to be.

Do you have website and will it or does it include your donors?  

Diaz: Yes and no. The information is on the city website. My donors have been mostly family and friends and now more city residents. I’m very proud that I manage my own campaign. That means the messaging and what people say; I’m accountable to that — if someone misrepresents me they know I will address it.

Roth: I hadn’t thought of it, but it’s on the city website. My campaign is mostly self-funded with some money from friends. It’s a small grassroots campaign and I didn’t seek endorsements as I want to stay unbiased and independent.

Vidovic: Donors are found on city website. I’m not updating my site much; I’m getting out knocking on doors. I’d love for people to look where my money’s coming from. It’s not coming from the real estate agents and developers and city planners … Who is giving me money are local residents … with a lot of small donations. My opponent has received thirty to forty-five percent of his campaign contributions from real estate agents and other commercial developers. 

Ayoub: No, they’re all listed on the city website. It’s public record.

Contributions from the city’s M-2 Treasurer Reports as of publication:

  • Ayoub:  $21,495
  • Diaz:     $8,116
  • Estok:    $772
  • Roth:     $2,707
  • Vidovic:  $10,347

Some candidates offered final thoughts:

Estok: I want to revamp city code re[garding] zoning and get citizen involvement in large budget questions.

Diaz: I’m not interested in the hostility in the city; I don’t need to do that as I’m well-qualified and I have no conflicts of interest. I’ve served for six years and am passionate about Safety Harbor. I want the best for the city and residents; my core value is that the community is the most important thing — keeping people happy and engaged in the city. If the residents want development, great. If they want something else, that’s great also.

Roth: I’m running because I worked with the Sierra Club to get Safety Harbor to agree to the Ready For 100 initiative. In that process I attended a few city council meetings and I observed what I considered dysfunction and a disregard for the viewpoints of residents. After following up on this I found that there’s a large group of people who felt the same way.

There have been a few articles about our local election, some with a focus on the controversies between candidates, in local news media. Here are links to this additional coverage:

Candidate websites often include biographical information and formal policy positions. We’ve included links here for further reference.

Prior to commenting on articles, whether on the Safety Harbor Sun website or associated social media accounts, please review our Engagement Guidelines.

Go to Top